$P_1x_1 + P_2x_2 \le m$ $P_1x_1 + P_2x_2 = m$ where, $P_i$ is price of $i$ with quantity $x_i$ and $m$ is income.
Since income and $P_i$ is constant,
$P_1 dx_1 + P_2 d x_2 = 0$ Hence, $\frac{dx_1}{dx_2} = -\frac{p_2}{p_1}$
This is the slope of the budget line.
Therefore, the budget curve changes as income or price levels change.
This shifts the line to the right (left) as income increases(decreases).
Slope remains same
When price changes, the intercept moves towards(away from) origin as price increases(decreases).
$ | \text{Slope} | $ changes linearly in $P_1$ and inversely $P_2$, but remains negative. |
Price of good increases. Hence, budget line changes, as above
Price of good decreases. Hence, budget line changes, as above
Along with the above budget line equality, we have additional constraint $x_i\le x_i^*$
They cannot intersect
\(u = f(x_1, x_2) = k\) \(du = \frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{x_1}} dx_1 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_2} dx_2\) \(\frac{\frac{du}{dx_1}}{\frac{du}{dx_2}} = -\frac{dx_2}{dx_1}\) \(\frac{Mu_1}{Mu_2} = -\frac{dx_2}{dx_1}\)
Aim is to maximize utility subject to budget curve.
Hence, we define Composite utility function using the lagrange multiplier definition.
\[P(\{x_i\}) = U(\{x_i\}) - \lambda \left(\sum_i p_i x_i - M\right)\] \[\frac{\partial{F}}{x_i} = \frac{\partial{u}}{\partial x_i} - \lambda p_i = 0\]Hence,
\[\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_i} = \lambda p_i\] \[\frac{mu_i}{p_i} = \lambda = \frac{mu_i}{p_i}\]Hence, $\frac{Mu_1}{Mu_2} = \frac{p_1}{p_2}$
$MRS_{x_1, x_2} = \frac{Mu_1}{Mu_2}, \frac{p_1}{p_2}$
$MRS$ is the slope of the indifference curve
$\frac{p_1}{p_2}$ is the slope of budget curve.
Hence, the equilibrium point is when slope of indifference curve is equal to slope of budget line. Therefore, E is where the budget line is tangential to the indifference curve.